CAEP Review
The University of Nebraska at Lincoln educator preparation program is accredited by the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). This accreditation certifies that the University of Nebraska at Lincoln has provided evidence that it adheres to CAEP’s standards. More information can be found on the CAEP website.
The University of Nebraska at Lincoln (UNL) educator preparation program is composed of seven departments. The singular goal is to provide quality educator preparation programs for teaching, educational administration, and related service careers in education, equipping completers to enhance the lives of individuals, families, schools and communities. The UNL program prepares its completers to serve all learners, including those who face opportunity gaps, in a variety of educational environments.
With an emphasis on collaboration among programs, colleges and stakeholder groups, the UNL educator preparation program offers degree, certification and endorsement programs at the initial and advanced levels with multiple field and clinical experiences. UNL offers initial and advanced educator preparation programs.
The Data
ENDORSEMENT PROGRAM ACCREDITATION
Initial Licensure Programs
| Program | Grade Bands |
| Agricultural Education | 6-12 |
| Biology | 7-12 |
| Business, Marketing & Information Technology | 6-12 |
| Chemistry | 7-12 |
| Early Childhood Inclusive | Birth-Grade 3 |
| Earth & Space Science | 7-12 |
| Elementary Education | K-6 |
| English Language Arts | 7-12 |
| Family & Consumer Sciences Occupational | 6-12 |
| Math | 6-12 |
| Music | PK-12 |
| Physics | 7-12 |
| School Psychologist | PK-12 |
| Science | 7-12 |
| Secondary English | 6-12 |
| Skilled & Technical Sciences | 6-12 |
| Social Sciences | 6-12 |
| Special Education Generalist | 6-12, K-8, K-12 |
| Special Education Early Childhood | Birth – PK |
| Speech Language Pathology | B-Age 21 |
| World Language (Spanish, Chinese, French, German, Russian, Latin, Japanese & Arabic) | 6-12 |
Advanced Licensure Programs
| Endorsement Programs | Grade Bands |
| Bilingual Education | PK-6, 7-12 |
| Coaching | 9-12 |
| Early Childhood Education | PK-3 |
| English as a Second Language | PK-6, 7-12 |
| Health Sciences Education | 6-12 |
| Information Technology | PK-12 |
| Instructional Technology Leadership | PK-12 |
| Journalism & Media Education | 7-12 |
| Orientation & Mobility Specialist (Special Services permit) | B-21 |
| Principal | PK-12, PK-8, 7-12 |
| Reading Specialist | PK-12 |
| Skilled & Technical Sciences Education -Skilled Specific | 9-12 |
| Special Education Behavior Intervention Specialist | B-12 |
| Special Education Deaf or Hard of Hearing | B-12 |
| Special Education Early Intervention Specialist | B-PK |
| Special Education Supervisor | B-12 |
| Special Education Visual Impairment | B-12 |
| Speech | 7-12 |
| Superintendent | PK-12 |
| Theatre | 7-12 |
| Work-Based Learning | 9-12 |
DEPARTMENTS
Seven departments are engaged in preparing our future educators.
- Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education (TLTE)
- Special Education and Communication Disorders (SECD)
- Child, Youth and Family Studies (CYAF)
- Educational Administration (EDAD)
- Educational Psychology (EDPS)
- Music Education (Glen Korff School of Music)
- Agricultural Education (Institute of Agriculture & Natural Resources)
- Skilled & Technical Sciences (Institute of Agriculture & Natural Resources)
See our accreditation page for more information.
ACCREDITATIONS
Accreditation helps separate UNL from other teacher preparation programs.
Why?
- It assists with quality assurance through external peer review.
- Provides standards for what new teachers need to know and experience to enter as classroom-ready teachers.
- Promotes continuous improvement and program self-assessment.
- Connects with national and state accountability systems.
- Supports quality preparation.
Accredited Programs
- Educator Preparation Programs – Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) and Nebraska Department of Education.
- School Psychology – The Ph.D. in school psychology is accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of the American Psychological Association, and the Ph.D. and Ed.S. in school psychology are approved by the National Association of School Psychologists.
- Speech Language Pathology – The M.S. in speech-language pathology and the Au.D. in audiology are accredited by the Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)
- Music Education – The Bachelor’s and Master’s in Music Education are accredited by the National Association of Schools of Music.
See our accreditation page for more information.
MEASURE 1: COMPLETER IMPACT AND EFFECTIVENESS
The Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) collects data each year from first- and third-year teachers and their employers for initial programs. The collected data is an indicator of teacher effectiveness based on InTasc standards as reported by both the teacher and the principal. The EPP participated in a NDE committee to develop a state survey to collect completed impact and effectiveness for advanced programs and is designing its own based on the state draft. Implementation will be Fall 2026.
UNL and State survey response rates.
Assessor | Survey Type | UNL Response Rate | State Response Rate |
Principals | 1st Year Teacher Survey | 67% | 67% |
Principals | 3rd Year Teacher Survey | 61% | 67% |
Teachers | 1st year Teacher Survey | 45% | 47% |
Teachers | 3rd Year Teacher Survey | 42% | 43% |
First year teachers employed in the 2024-2025 school year are May and August 2024 initial program completers.
Third year teachers employed in the 2024-2025 school year were May/August initial program completers.
Completer Effectiveness
1st year Teacher (2024-2025 School Year)
Would you consider this teacher effectively prepared for continuing employment in your district? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
N | Yes | No | |
| UNL FYT by Principal | 120 | 117 | 3 |
Do you believe you were prepared to be an effective 1st year teacher? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| N | Yes | No |
| UNL FYT by Teacher | 80 | 66 | 14 |
Summary of 1st Year Teacher Survey (2024-2025 School Year):
Principal responses indicate that UNL teachers are effectively prepared (98%). Data illustrates the majority of first year teacher respondents felt effectively prepared (82.5%). Survey results indicate that completers and employers agree the EPP effectively prepares first year teachers
3rd Year Teacher (2024-2025 School Year)
Would you consider this teacher effectively prepared for continuing employment in your district? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| N | Yes | No |
UNL TYT by Principal | 90 | 88 | 2 |
Do you believe you were prepared to be an effective 3rd year teacher? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| N | Yes | No |
UNL TYT by Teacher | 62 | 54 | 8 |
Summary of 3rd Year Teacher Survey (2024-2025 School Year):
Principal responses indicate that UNL third year teachers are effectively prepared (97.7%). Data illustrates that most third-year teachers felt effectively prepared (87%). Survey results illustrate that completers and employers agree the EPP preparation is effective for third year teachers.
Impact on P-12 Learning
1st year Teacher (2024-2025 School Year)
Based upon the performance of this first-year teacher, how would you rate his/her impact on student learning? | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Ineffective | Somewhat Effective | Moderately Effective | Highly Effective |
UNL FYT by Principal | 120 | 2 | 11 | 51 | 56 |
Based upon your performance as a first-year teacher, how would you rate your impact on student learning? | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Ineffective | Somewhat Effective | Moderately Effective | Highly Effective |
UNL FYT by Teacher | 80 | 0 | 6 | 55 | 19 |
Summary of 1st Year Teacher Survey (2024-2025 School Year):
Principal responses indicate that UNL prepared teachers positively impact student learning in their first year of employment at moderately or highly effective levels (89.1%). First-year teacher results reflect a positive student impact at a moderately or highly effective level (92.5%). Survey results illustrate that the EPP effectively prepares first year teachers to positively impact student learning.
3rd Year Teacher Survey (2024-2025 School Year)
Based upon the performance of this third-year teacher, how would you rate his/her impact on student learning? | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Ineffective | Somewhat Effective | Moderately Effective | Highly Effective |
UNL TYT by Principal | 90 | 1 | 8 | 37 | 44 |
Based upon your performance as a third-year teacher, how would you rate your impact on student learning? | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Ineffective | Somewhat Effective | Moderately Effective | Highly Effective |
UNL TYT by Teacher | 62 | 0 | 3 | 38 | 21 |
Summary of 3rd Year Survey (2024-2025 School Year):
Principal responses indicate that UNL prepared teachers positively impact student learning in their third year of employment at moderately or highly effective levels (95.1%). Third-year teacher results reflect a positive student impact at a moderately or highly effective level (90%). Survey results reflect that the EPP effectively prepares teachers to have a positive impact on student learning in their third year of employment.
MEASURE 2. SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYERS AND STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
Stakeholder Involvement
UNL initial programs engage with P-12 partners in a variety of collaborative partnerships. Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) and other agreements are developed between the P-12 partners with the UNL educator preparation programs to support clinical experiences for candidates. These P-12 partners also engage in annual Professional Education Committee (PEC) meetings with educator preparation faculty. The primary focus of the PEC is to review program data, including the Nebraska Department of Education 1st and 3rd Year survey data, Nebraska Clinical Practice Evaluation data as well as new and existing assessments from other instruments the program uses to assess candidates. An additional Advisory Board will be implemented for the EPP in academic year 2025-2026 to improve and increase stakeholder involvement and input.
Satisfaction of Employers/Completers
The Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) administers the Nebraska First Year Teacher Survey and Third Year Survey to both principals and to 1st and 3rd year teachers (Spring 2024). Evaluation indicators are based on the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) and Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Model Core Teaching Standards, 2011.
NDE 1st Year Survey
2023-2024 1st Year Teacher Survey by Principals*
UNL response rates: First year teacher survey by principals: 60%
Nebraska response rates: First year teacher survey by principals: 58%
NDE Standards (1-10) | Assessment Rubric Description | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | N | Mean | Mode | ||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |||||
| Standard 1 Learner Development | Uses knowledge of students to meet needs | 23 | 16.79% | 83 | 60.58% | 29 | 21.17% | 2 | 1.46% | 137 | 1.93 | 2 |
| Builds on student strengths to facilitate learning | 22 | 16.06% | 84 | 61.31% | 29 | 21.17% | 2 | 1.46% | 137 | 1.92 | 2 | |
| Standard 2 Learner Differences | Identifies differentiation in student needs | 17 | 12.41% | 87 | 63.50% | 30 | 21.90% | 3 | 2.19% | 137 | 1.86 | 2 |
| Differentiates instruction to meet student needs | 17 | 12.41% | 80 | 58.39% | 38 | 27.74% | 2 | 1.46% | 137 | 1.82 | 2 | |
| Brings multiple perspectives and cultural resources to content and discussions | 15 | 10.95% | 93 | 67.88% | 27 | 19.71% | 2 | 1.46% | 137 | 1.88 | 2 | |
| Standard 3 Learning Environments | Promotes a positive classroom environments through clear expectations | 40 | 29.20% | 76 | 55.47% | 19 | 13.87% | 2 | 1.46% | 137 | 2.12 | 2 |
| Uses and communicates clear task and behavioral expectations to support an environment of learning | 28 | 20.44% | 74 | 54.01% | 31 | 22.63% | 4 | 2.92% | 137 | 1.92 | 2 | |
| Standard 4 Content Knowledge | Uses and communicates content knowledge | 22 | 16.06% | 100 | 72.99% | 14 | 10.22% | 1 | 0.73% | 137 | 2.04 | 2 |
| Uses academic vocabulary and grammar | 26 | 18.98% | 99 | 72.26% | 11 | 8.03% | 1 | 0.73% | 137 | 2.09 | 2 | |
| Provides opportunities for students to demonstrate their content knowledge | 22 | 16.06% | 95 | 69.34% | 19 | 13.87% | 1 | 0.73% | 137 | 2.01 | 2 | |
| Standard 5 Application of Content | Helps students link concepts and enagage in critical thinking | 14 | 10.22% | 82 | 59.85% | 38 | 27.74% | 3 | 2.19% | 137 | 1.78 | 2 |
| Engages students in the development of literacy and communication skills | 17 | 12.41% | 93 | 67.88% | 24 | 17.52% | 3 | 2.19% | 137 | 1.91 | 2 | |
| Standard 6 Assessment | Matches instructions and assessments to learning objectives | 18 | 13.14% | 96 | 70.07% | 22 | 16.06% | 1 | 0.73% | 137 | 1.96 | 2 |
| Uses formative and summative classroom assessments that facilitate learning | 16 | 11.68% | 96 | 70.07% | 23 | 16.79% | 2 | 1.46% | 137 | 1.92 | 2 | |
| Amends instructional strategies and adapts interventions as needed | 14 | 10.22% | 87 | 63.50% | 33 | 24.09% | 3 | 2.19% | 137 | 1.82 | 2 | |
| Provides differentiated instruction and assessments that positively impacts learning | 10 | 7.30% | 90 | 65.69% | 35 | 25.55% | 2 | 1.46% | 137 | 1.79 | 2 | |
| Standard 7 Planning for Instruction | Plans sequenced learning experiences and performance tasks linked to learning objectives | 17 | 12.41% | 97 | 70.80% | 20 | 14.60% | 3 | 2.19% | 137 | 1.93 | 2 |
| Plans and implements multiple ways for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills | 16 | 11.68% | 88 | 64.23% | 31 | 22.63% | 2 | 1.46% | 137 | 1.86 | 2 | |
| Standard 8 Instructional Strategies | Incorporates digital tools and technologies into instruction | 21 | 15.33% | 100 | 72.99% | 15 | 10.95% | 1 | 0.73% | 137 | 2.03 | 2 |
| Uses evidence-based strategies to support critical thinking and content learning | 12 | 8.76% | 87 | 63.50% | 37 | 27.01% | 1 | 0.73% | 137 | 1.80 | 2 | |
| Organizes and manages the learning environment to maximize student engagement | 22 | 16.06% | 83 | 60.58% | 28 | 20.44% | 4 | 2.92% | 137 | 1.90 | 2 | |
| Standard 9 Professional Learning and Ethical Practice | Invites constructive feedback and responds positively | 37 | 27.01% | 82 | 59.85% | 15 | 10.95% | 3 | 2.19% | 137 | 2.12 | 2 |
| Sets and implements goals to improve practice | 25 | 18.25% | 89 | 64.96% | 20 | 14.60% | 3 | 2.19% | 137 | 1.99 | 2 | |
| Standard 10 Leadership and Collaboration | Communicates professionally - oral, written, and electronic | 30 | 21.90% | 90 | 65.69% | 16 | 11.68% | 1 | 0.73% | 137 | 2.09 | 2 |
| Responds to people, problems, and crises effectively | 28 | 20.44% | 81 | 59.12% | 24 | 17.52% | 4 | 2.92% | 137 | 1.97 | 2 |
2023-2024 1st Year Teacher Survey by Teachers*
UNL response rates: First year teacher survey by teachers: XX%
Nebraska response rates: First year teacher survey by teachers: 54.91%
*First year teachers employed in the 2023-2024 school year are May 2023 graduates and initial completers at the undergraduate level and initial completers during the 2022-2023 academic year at the graduate level.
NDE Standards (1-10) | Assessment Rubric Description | 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| N | Mean | Mode |
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % |
|
|
| |
| Standard 1 Learner Development | Uses knowledge of students to meet needs | 21 | 15.22% | 87 | 63.04% | 30 | 21.74% | 0 | 0.00% | 138 | 1.93 | 2 |
| Builds on student strengths to facilitate learning | 28 | 20.29% | 88 | 63.77% | 21 | 15.22% | 1 | 0.72% | 138 | 2.04 | 2 |
| Standard 2 Learner Differences | Identifies differentiation in student needs | 19 | 13.77% | 85 | 61.59% | 33 | 23.91% | 1 | 0.72% | 138 | 1.88 | 2 |
| Differentiates instruction to meet student needs | 14 | 10.14% | 76 | 55.07% | 44 | 31.88% | 4 | 2.90% | 138 | 1.72 | 2 |
| Brings multiple perspectives and cultural resources to content and discussions | 29 | 21.01% | 83 | 60.14% | 21 | 15.22% | 5 | 3.62% | 138 | 1.99 | 2 |
| Standard 3 Learning Environments | Promotes a positive classroom environment through clear expectations | 60 | 43.48% | 63 | 45.65% | 13 | 9.42% | 2 | 1.45% | 138 | 2.31 | 2 |
| Uses and communicates clear task and behavioral expectations to support an environment of learning | 34 | 24.64% | 71 | 51.45% | 25 | 18.12% | 8 | 5.80% | 138 | 1.95 | 2 |
| Standard 4 Content Knowledge | Uses and communicates content knowledge | 28 | 20.29% | 95 | 68.84% | 14 | 10.14% | 1 | 0.72% | 138 | 2.09 | 2 |
| Uses academic vocabulary and grammar | 28 | 20.29% | 92 | 66.67% | 18 | 13.04% | 0 | 0.00% | 138 | 2.07 | 2 |
| Provides opportunities for students to demonstrate their content knowledge | 22 | 15.94% | 93 | 67.39% | 23 | 16.67% | 0 | 0.00% | 138 | 1.99 | 2 |
| Standard 5 Application of Content | Helps students link concepts and enagages in critical thinking | 16 | 11.59% | 87 | 63.04% | 35 | 25.36% | 0 | 0.00% | 138 | 1.86 | 2 |
| Engages students in the development of literacy and communication skills | 14 | 10.14% | 89 | 64.49% | 33 | 23.91% | 2 | 1.45% | 138 | 1.83 | 2 |
| Standard 6 Assessment | Matches instructions and assessments to learning objectives | 28 | 20.29% | 88 | 63.77% | 21 | 15.22% | 1 | 0.72% | 138 | 2.04 | 2 |
| Uses formative and summative classroom assessments that facilitate learning | 32 | 23.19% | 83 | 60.14% | 21 | 15.22% | 2 | 1.45% | 138 | 2.05 | 2 |
| Amends instructional strategies and adapts interventions as needed | 21 | 15.22% | 79 | 57.25% | 34 | 24.64% | 4 | 2.90% | 138 | 1.85 | 2 |
| Provides differentiated instruction and assessments that positively impacts learning | 19 | 13.77% | 84 | 60.87% | 33 | 23.91% | 2 | 1.45% | 138 | 1.87 | 2 |
| Standard 7 Planning for Instruction | Plans sequenced learning experiences and performance tasks linked to learning objectives | 28 | 20.29% | 82 | 59.42% | 27 | 19.57% | 1 | 0.72% | 138 | 1.99 | 2 |
| Plans and implements multiple ways for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills | 25 | 18.12% | 78 | 56.52% | 34 | 24.64% | 1 | 0.72% | 138 | 1.92 | 2 |
| Standard 8 Instructional Strategies | Incorporates digital tools and technologies into instruction | 31 | 22.46% | 79 | 57.25% | 24 | 17.39% | 4 | 2.90% | 138 | 1.99 | 2 |
| Uses evidence-based strategies to support critical thinking and content learning | 21 | 15.22% | 92 | 66.67% | 25 | 18.12% | 0 | 0.00% | 138 | 1.97 | 2 |
| Organizes and manages the learning environment to maximize student engagement | 19 | 13.77% | 78 | 56.52% | 37 | 26.81% | 4 | 2.90% | 138 | 1.81 | 2 |
| Standard 9 Professional Learning and Ethical Practice | Invites constructive feedback and responds positively | 51 | 36.96% | 73 | 52.90% | 14 | 10.14% | 0 | 0.00% | 138 | 2.27 | 2 |
| Sets and implements goals to improve practice | 37 | 26.81% | 84 | 60.87% | 17 | 12.32% | 0 | 0.00% | 138 | 2.14 | 2 |
| Standard 10 Leadership and Collaboration | Communicates professionally - oral, written, and electronic | 55 | 39.86% | 72 | 52.17% | 10 | 7.25% | 1 | 0.72% | 138 | 2.31 | 2 |
| Responds to people, problems, and crises effectively | 45 | 32.61% | 70 | 50.72% | 18 | 13.04% | 5 | 3.62% | 138 | 2.12 | 2 |
2023-2024 3rd Year Teacher Survey by Principals**
UNL response rates: Third year teacher survey by principals: 57%
Nebraska response rates: Third year teacher survey by principals: 64%
NDE Standards (1-10) | Assessment Rubric Description | 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| N | Mean | Mode |
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % |
|
|
| |
| Standard 1 Learner Development | Uses knowledge of students to meet needs | 27 | 28.42% | 56 | 58.95% | 12 | 12.63% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.16 | 2 |
| Builds on student strengths to facilitate learning | 30 | 31.58% | 54 | 56.84% | 11 | 11.58% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.20 | 2 |
| Standard 2 Learner Differences | Identifies differentiation in student needs | 27 | 28.42% | 58 | 61.05% | 10 | 10.53% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.18 | 2 |
| Differentiates instruction to meet student needs | 23 | 24.21% | 57 | 60.00% | 15 | 15.79% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.08 | 2 |
| Brings multiple perspectives and cultural resources to content and discussions | 24 | 25.26% | 60 | 63.16% | 11 | 11.58% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.14 | 2 |
| Standard 3 Learning Environments | Promotes a positive classroom environment through clear expectations | 46 | 48.42% | 39 | 41.05% | 10 | 10.53% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.38 | 3 |
| Uses and communicates clear task and behavioral expectations to support an environment of learning | 34 | 35.79% | 49 | 51.58% | 11 | 11.58% | 1 | 1.05% | 95 | 2.22 | 2 |
| Standard 4 Content Knowledge | Uses and communicates content knowledge | 32 | 33.68% | 58 | 61.05% | 5 | 5.26% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.28 | 2 |
| Uses academic vocabulary and grammar | 30 | 31.58% | 59 | 62.11% | 6 | 6.32% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.25 | 2 |
| Provides opportunities for students to demonstrate their content knowledge | 34 | 35.79% | 56 | 58.95% | 5 | 5.26% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.31 | 2 |
| Standard 5 Application of Content | Helps students link concepts and enagages in critical thinking | 24 | 25.26% | 56 | 58.95% | 15 | 15.79% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.09 | 2 |
| Engages students in the development of literacy and communication skills | 26 | 27.37% | 58 | 61.05% | 11 | 11.58% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.16 | 2 |
| Standard 6 Assessment | Matches instructions and assessments to learning objectives | 33 | 34.74% | 55 | 57.89% | 7 | 7.37% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.27 | 2 |
| Uses formative and summative classroom assessments that facilitate learning | 29 | 30.53% | 57 | 60.00% | 9 | 9.47% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.21 | 2 |
| Amends instructional strategies and adapts interventions as needed | 28 | 29.47% | 56 | 58.95% | 11 | 11.58% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.18 | 2 |
| Provides differentiated instruction and assessments that positively impacts learning | 28 | 29.47% | 57 | 60.00% | 10 | 10.53% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.19 | 2 |
| Standard 7 Planning for Instruction | Plans sequenced learning experiences and performance tasks linked to learning objectives | 32 | 33.68% | 60 | 63.16% | 3 | 3.16% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.31 | 2 |
| Plans and implements multiple ways for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills | 31 | 32.63% | 57 | 60.00% | 7 | 7.37% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.25 | 2 |
| Standard 8 Instructional Strategies | Incorporates digital tools and technologies into instruction | 28 | 29.47% | 65 | 68.42% | 2 | 2.11% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.27 | 2 |
| Uses evidence-based strategies to support critical thinking and content learning | 26 | 27.37% | 56 | 58.95% | 13 | 13.68% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.14 | 2 |
| Organizes and manages the learning environment to maximize student engagement | 35 | 36.84% | 51 | 53.68% | 8 | 8.42% | 1 | 1.05% | 95 | 2.26 | 2 |
| Standard 9 Professional Learning and Ethical Practice | Invites constructive feedback and responds positively | 37 | 38.95% | 51 | 53.68% | 7 | 7.37% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.32 | 2 |
| Sets and implements goals to improve practice | 33 | 34.74% | 55 | 57.89% | 7 | 7.37% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.27 | 2 |
| Standard 10 Leadership and Collaboration | Communicates professionally - oral, written, and electronic | 32 | 33.68% | 51 | 53.68% | 12 | 12.63% | 0 | 0.00% | 95 | 2.21 | 2 |
| Responds to people, problems, and crises effectively | 30 | 31.58% | 48 | 50.53% | 16 | 16.84% | 1 | 1.05% | 95 | 2.13 | 2 |
2023-2024 3rd Year Teacher Survey by Teachers**
UNL response rates: Third year teacher survey by teachers: 51%
Nebraska response rates: Third year teacher survey by teachers: 56%
**Third year teachers employed in the 2023-2024 school year are May 2021 graduates and initial completers at the undergraduate level and initial completers during the 2020-2021 academic year at the graduate level.
| NDE Standards (1-10) | Assessment Rubric Description | 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| N | Mean | Mode |
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % |
|
|
| |
| Standard 1 Learner Development | Uses knowledge of students to meet needs | 14 | 16.47% | 63 | 74.12% | 8 | 9.41% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.07 | 2 |
| Builds on student strengths to facilitate learning | 19 | 22.35% | 60 | 70.59% | 6 | 7.06% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.15 | 2 |
| Standard 2 Learner Differences | Identifies differentiation in student needs | 15 | 17.65% | 54 | 63.53% | 16 | 18.82% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 1.99 | 2 |
| Differentiates instruction to meet student needs | 7 | 8.24% | 49 | 57.65% | 29 | 34.12% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 1.74 | 2 |
| Brings multiple perspectives and cultural resources to content and discussions | 17 | 20.00% | 53 | 62.35% | 15 | 17.65% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.02 | 2 |
| Standard 3 Learning Environments | Promotes a positive classroom environment through clear expectations | 45 | 52.94% | 38 | 44.71% | 2 | 2.35% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.51 | 3 |
| Uses and communicates clear task and behavioral expectations to support an environment of learning | 24 | 28.24% | 49 | 57.65% | 10 | 11.76% | 2 | 2.35% | 85 | 2.12 | 2 |
| Standard 4 Content Knowledge | Uses and communicates content knowledge | 29 | 34.12% | 53 | 62.35% | 3 | 3.53% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.31 | 2 |
| Uses academic vocabulary and grammar | 27 | 31.76% | 54 | 63.53% | 4 | 4.71% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.27 | 2 |
| Provides opportunities for students to demonstrate their content knowledge | 26 | 30.59% | 56 | 65.88% | 3 | 3.53% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.27 | 2 |
| Standard 5 Application of Content | Helps students link concepts and enagages in critical thinking | 10 | 11.76% | 62 | 72.94% | 13 | 15.29% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 1.96 | 2 |
| Engages students in the development of literacy and communication skills | 14 | 16.47% | 64 | 75.29% | 7 | 8.24% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.08 | 2 |
| Standard 6 Assessment | Matches instructions and assessments to learning objectives | 16 | 18.82% | 58 | 68.24% | 11 | 12.94% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.06 | 2 |
| Uses formative and summative classroom assessments that facilitate learning | 20 | 23.53% | 56 | 65.88% | 9 | 10.59% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.13 | 2 |
| Amends instructional strategies and adapts interventions as needed | 13 | 15.29% | 53 | 62.35% | 18 | 21.18% | 1 | 1.18% | 85 | 1.92 | 2 |
| Provides differentiated instruction and assessments that positively impacts learning | 9 | 10.59% | 59 | 69.41% | 16 | 18.82% | 1 | 1.18% | 85 | 1.89 | 2 |
| Standard 7 Planning for Instruction | Plans sequenced learning experiences and performance tasks linked to learning objectives | 26 | 30.59% | 52 | 61.18% | 7 | 8.24% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.22 | 2 |
| Plans and implements multiple ways for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills | 21 | 24.71% | 57 | 67.06% | 7 | 8.24% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.16 | 2 |
| Standard 8 Instructional Strategies | Incorporates digital tools and technologies into instruction | 29 | 34.12% | 48 | 56.47% | 8 | 9.41% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.25 | 2 |
| Uses evidence-based strategies to support critical thinking and content learning | 21 | 24.71% | 55 | 64.71% | 9 | 10.59% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.14 | 2 |
| Organizes and manages the learning environment to maximize student engagement | 14 | 16.47% | 57 | 67.06% | 13 | 15.29% | 1 | 1.18% | 85 | 1.99 | 2 |
| Standard 9 Professional Learning and Ethical Practice | Invites constructive feedback and responds positively | 29 | 34.12% | 52 | 61.18% | 4 | 4.71% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.29 | 2 |
| Sets and implements goals to improve practice | 26 | 30.59% | 55 | 64.71% | 4 | 4.71% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.26 | 2 |
| Standard 10 Leadership and Collaboration | Communicates professionally - oral, written, and electronic | 35 | 41.18% | 44 | 51.76% | 6 | 7.06% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.34 | 2 |
| Responds to people, problems, and crises effectively | 24 | 28.24% | 47 | 55.29% | 14 | 16.47% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 2.12 | 2 |
MEASURE 3. CANDIDATE COMPETENCY AT COMPLETION
Initial Completer Licensing
Praxis Content Assessment: Required by the Nebraska Department of Education for licensure, the purpose of this test is to assess a beginning teacher’s understanding, knowledge and skills. In addition to content knowledge, the exam also assesses teaching strategies, educational psychology, instructional processes, diverse learners and professional issues.
The table below provides information on the UNL educator preparation program candidate performance at completion by endorsement program as designated by the Nebraska Department of Education for the last two years. Praxis content exam data was not reported for programs with five or less test takers.
Initial Program
UNL | Nebraska | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Academic Year | # Taking Exam | % Passing | Mean | Exam Cut Score | % Passing | Mean | # Taking Exam |
| Agricultural Education | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 19 | 95% | 167.37 | 95% | 167.3 | 19 | |
| 2023-2024 | 12 | 100% | 174 | 92% | 171 | 13 | |
| Biology | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 1 | * | * | 154 | 90% | 158.02 | 10 |
| 2023-2024 | 3 | * | * | 154 | 38% | 151.13 | 8 |
| BMIT | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 9 | 89% | 164.67 | 154 | 90% | 171.34 | 29 |
| 2023-2024 | 2 | * | 154 | 86% | 166.93 | 14 | |
| Chemistry | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 2 | * | * | 146 | 100% | 154.61 | 5 |
| 2023-2024 | 1 | * | * | 146 | * | * | 1 |
| Early Childhood Inclusive | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 6 | 100% | 173 | 160 | 83% | 169 | 84 |
| 2023-2024 | 2 | * | * | 160 | 74% | 166 | 82 |
| Earth & Space Science – no program completers | |||||||
| Elementary Education | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 165 | 93% | 167.73 | 91% | 166.96 | 566 | |
| 2023-2024 | 94 | 89% | 166.3 | 86% | 166.1 | 421 | |
| English Language Arts/Secondary English | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 22 | 75% | 176.41 | 168 | 86% | 175.44 | 108 |
| 2023-2024 | 4 | * | * | 168 | 72% | 172.20 | 66 |
| Family & Consumer Sciences | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 17 | 88% | 163.82 | 153 | 85% | 162.11 | 27 |
| 2023-2024 | 7 | 86% | 162.29 | 153 | 93% | 160.36 | 14 |
| Math | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 15 | 93% | 182.07 | 159 | 88% | 175.7 | 57 |
| 2023-2024 | 3 | * | * | 159 | 77% | 168.27 | 26 |
| Music | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 19 | 89% | 165.16 | 152 | 88% | 161.57 | 74 |
| 2023-2024 | 17 | 88% | 165.47 | 152 | 84% | 163.82 | 45 |
| Physics | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 0 | * | * | 145 | * | * | 2 |
| 2023-2024 | 0 | * | * | 145 | * | * | 0 |
| Science | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 1 | * | * | 141 | * | * | 3 |
| 2023-2024 | 4 | * | * | 141 | 95% | 168 | 20 |
| Skilled & Technical Sciences – No exam required for licensure | |||||||
| Social Science | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 30 | 97% | 169 | 154 | 92% | 167.44 | 91 |
| 2023-2024 | 15 | 87% | 166 | 154 | 82% | 164 | 71 |
| Special Education Generalist | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 34 | 97% | 170.88 | 151 | 98% | 172.26 | 216 |
| 2023-2024 | 19 | 100% | 170.05 | 151 | 97% | 171.88 | 156 |
| World Language-Spanish | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 7 | 57% | 165.29 | 156 | 56% | 160.31 | 32 |
| 2023-2024 | 2 | * | * | 156 | 73% | 169.13 | 15 |
| World Language-French | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 4 | * | * | 162 | 43% | 159.43 | 7 |
| 2023-2024 | 2 | * | * | 162 | 67% | 162.83 | 6 |
| World Language-German | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 1 | * | * | 163 | * | * | 1 |
| 2023-2024 | 0 | * | * | 163 | * | * | 0 |
| World Language-Latin | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 1 | * | * | 155 | * | * | 1 |
| 2023-2024 | 0 | * | * | 155 | * | * | 0 |
| *no completers in Russian (inactive) and no exam required for other languages | |||||||
Advanced Program Candidate Competency at Completion
Advanced Program Completer Licensing
Praxis Content Assessment: Required by the Nebraska Department of Education for licensure, the purpose of this test is to assess a completer’s understanding, knowledge and skills required for specialized educational work. In addition to content knowledge, the exam also assesses strategies, leadership, educational psychology, instructional processes, diverse learners and professional issues.
The table below provides information on the UNL educator preparation program advanced program completer performance by endorsement program as designated by the Nebraska Department of Education. Praxis content exam data was not reported for programs with five or less test takers.
UNL | Nebraska | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AY | # Taking Exam | % Passing Exam | Mean | Exam Cut Score | % Passing Exam | Mean | # Taking Exam |
| Educational Administration Leadership Superintendent (district) | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 2 | * | * | 162 | 92% | 171.68 | 37 |
| 2023-2024 | 2 | * | * | 162 | 86% | 169 | 37 |
| Educational Administration Leadership(building) | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 14 | 93% | 168.93 | 146 | 98% | 167.88 | 291 |
| 2023-2024 | 12 | 100% | 167.25 | 146 | 99% | 168.25 | 177 |
| School Psychologist | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 6 | 100% | 178 | 155 | 100% | 178.50 | 28 |
| 2023-2024 | 3 | * | * | 155 | 38% | 151.13 | 8 |
| Reading Specialist | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 0 | * | * | 165 | 81% | 169.41 | 32 |
| 2023-2024 | 1 | * | * | 165 | 65% | 166.93 | 14 |
| School Counselor – no completers (inactive program) | |||||||
| SPED Deaf or Hard of Hearing | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 4 | * | * | 160 | 67% | 169 | 6 |
| 2023-2024 | 3 | * | * | 160 | * | * | 3 |
| SPED Visual Impairments | |||||||
| 2022-2023 | 4 | * | * | 163 | * | * | 4 |
| 2023-2024 | 4 | * | * | 163 | * | * | 4 |
MEASURE 4. ABILITY OF COMPLETERS TO BE HIRED
Candidates who complete the UNL educator preparation program have a high rate of employment in the area in which they were prepared and pursuing licensure in both Nebraska and other states. The data illustrates the employability of initial and advanced program completers for positions for which they have been prepared. Completer data for those who have not chosen employment or licensure, are pursuing other opportunities or who have not notified the EPP of employment status are included.
Initial Completers
| Year | Certified | FT Teacher | PT Teacher | State Substitute | Other or Unknown |
2024-2025 May 24 completers | N=319 | 85 27% | 9 3% | 4 13% | 29 9% |
2023-24 May 23 completers | N=260 | 225 87% | 9 3% | 2 1% | 24 9% |
Initial Completer Employment Status by Content Area for 2024-2025 (2023-2024 completers)
Please note that candidates are counted in more than one subject area if they completed multiple programs but are only counted once in the employment data. For example, a candidate prepared in Elementary Education & Special Education is counted as a completer in both programs but only counted in the area in which they are employed). The employment data is based on survey information and licensure verifications for employment. Completers are counted in the Other/Unknown column because they may have chosen other fields of employment, pursued of out of state licensure without verification or failed to report their plans/employment status.
| Preparation Area | Completers | Teaching FT/PT | Other Or Unknown |
| Agricultural Education | 9 | 7 | 2 |
| Biology | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Business, Marketing, Info Tech | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Early Childhood Inclusive | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 126 | 98 | 28 |
| Special Education | 19 | 19 | 0 |
| English Language Arts/Secondary English | 9 | 7 | 2 |
| FCS Occupational | 11 | 10 | 1 |
| Math | 9 | 6 | 3 |
| Music (Nationally Accredited) | 26 | 16 | 10 |
| Science | 6 | 6 | 0 |
| Social Science | 26 | 24 | 2 |
| Skilled & Technical Sciences | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Early Childhood Special Education | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| World Language (French, Spanish, German, Latin) | 6 | 5 | 1 |
2023-2024 Initial Completers are employed in the following School Districts for the 2024-2025 School Year:
- Ashland Greenwood Public Schools
- Battle Creek Public Schools
- Beatrice Public Schools
- Bellevue Public Schools
- Bennington Public Schools
- Chase County Schools
- Crete Public Schools
- Diller-Odell Public Schools
- Elkhorn Public Schools
- Fairbury Public Schools
- Fremont Public Schools
- Hayes Center Public Schools
- High Plains Community Schools
- Lakeview Community Schools
- Lincoln Public Schools
- Malcolm Public Schools
- Meridian Public Schools
- Millard Public Schools
- Newman Grove Public Schools
- North American Martyrs School
- Omaha Public Schools
- Papillion LaVista Community Schools
- Sandy Creek Schools
- Seward Public Schools
- St. Vincent De Paul Elementary
- Sutherland Public Schools
- Waverly School District 145
- Wayne Community Schools
- Westside Community Schools
- Wynot Public Schools
- York Public Schools
Advanced Program Completers Hiring
UNL Advanced Program completers are employed in a variety of public and private school districts. Below is information from 2023-2024 completers who have obtained endorsements from the Nebraska Department of Education in the fields of their preparation, qualifying them for positions for which they may be employed. A list of districts employing our advanced completers is also included.
Educational Leadership and Supervision Graduate Endorsement
- 3 completers obtained licensure as a Superintendent with the Nebraska Department of Education. (district)
- 18 completers obtained licensure as a P-12 administrator, 1 completer obtained out of state licensure and 17 obtained licensure by the Nebraska Department of Education (building)
Special Education Graduate Endorsement
- 7 Visual Impairment completers obtained licensure, with 4 completers obtaining out of state licensure and 3 being issued licensure by the Nebraska Department of Education.
- UNL offers one of the few Visual Impairment preparation programs in the nation resulting in completers being from across the country.
- 9 Deaf or Hard of Hearing completers obtained licensure, with 3 completers receiving out of state licensure and 6 being issued licensure by the Nebraska Department of Education.
Reading Specialist Graduate Endorsement
- There were no completers in 2023-2024
Speech Language Pathologists Program (nationally accredited by ASHA)
- 19 completers obtained licensure from the Nebraska Department of Education
School Psychology Program (nationally accredited by NASP)
- Four completers obtained licensure, 3 from the Nebraska Department of Education and 1 from the Illinois Department of Education
2023-2024 Advanced Program Completers in the UNL educator preparation program are employed in the following districts or the 2024-2025 school year:
- Papillion LaVista Community Schools
- Lincoln Public Schools
- High Plains Community Schools
- Battle Creek Public Schools
- Omaha Public Schools
- Westside Community Schools
Other states in which completers hold employment:
- Colorado
- Illinois
- Kansas
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Wisconsin